Wednesday, November 5, 2014

Repeating it doesn't make it truer

My husband and I have an acquaintance who he met through one of his former graduate school classmates. He was her boyfriend at the time that he first crossed my husband's path and is currently her fiance. At my first meeting with the boyfriend, I accidentally embarrassed him and he has carried a little grudge ever since.

The nature of that mistake was that we were all sitting in a bar at a social gathering during the first month of my husband's first year at his school. The girlfriend set up this informal little to-do, and we went largely so my husband could make some social connections at this early stage. I had previously met the girlfriend, so I knew her slightly from a potluck held about a week earlier. I figured that an easy way to relate to him was through his relationship with her so I asked how they met. He said it was at a party full of people and he saw her from across the room. I asked what I thought was a reasonable follow-up question given the situation and that was, "What drew you to her in particular?"

This question stymied him. He seemed dumbstruck for an answer and I'd just come off of years of teaching English in which I'd dealt with students who were often at a loss for words because they couldn't express themselves, so I tried to "help" by asking if it was this or that about her (attitude, style or whatever). He continued to be confused and then, after "thinking" for awhile, he switched to an ad hominem attack and said something like, 'you know the problem with you psychology types is you think about "why" too much instead of just taking things as they are.' At that point, I dropped my line of questioning on this issue, and it was hardly a probing attack. It was one question and a few suggestions and then he got defensive.

Fast forward a year and a half or so and my husband is having a conversation with someone else who felt that I had an aggressive way of carrying on a discussion. In her case, she had a point as we were debating a political point and she was being an idiot about it (the short version of it is that she suggested that vandalizing public advertising was somehow going to help undermine the effects of white privilege). The girlfriend from the previous scenario got caught up in this and remarked that, "Oh yeah, she (meaning me) is like that." She meant that I was too tenacious and she said that based on my (well-meaning) attempts to make conversation with her boyfriend from a very long time ago.

What I took away from this was that the boyfriend was more than embarrassed by his inability to come up with what attracted him to his girlfriend. He was humiliated and it stung enough for him to make a big deal out of it such that the girlfriend made this remark about a brief exchange from nearly two years previously. This told me something more than I'd already speculated on. One thing was that my guess is that he could have answered the question, but the answer was too embarrassing (like he saw her wearing a corset with her big boobs heaved up - she designs them and does wear them from time to time). The other was that he is deeply insecure and hates to feel as if he's been somehow been bested. This was not my intent on either count, but I think that is how he felt.

Fast forward to a graduation party for my husband's graduate school class and both girlfriend and insecure boyfriend are there. Given my knowledge of how fragile his ego is, I planned to be extra careful about whatever I said to him and planned to avoid any questioning of any kind. When we arrived, most of the seats were taken and people needed to sit on the ground. Boyfriend was sitting in one chair and his girlfriend in another. I told my husband to take the remaining one because he had had to stand a lot during the graduation ceremonial activities and I was sitting.

The boyfriend offered me his seat and I accepted it. My husband made a joke and asked him if he gave up the seat to me because of "Jewish guilt" (the boyfriend told us he was Jewish). Since I was concerned that someone with such a fragile ego would be offended by this, I cut in and said, "I'm sure it is just an act of courtesy." The boyfriend then went on to say that courtesy was a way for people of superior intelligence to make those of lesser mental capacity feel comfortable. He essentially insulted us by saying he was being kind because we were dumber than him. Of course, I let this go as I saw this as yet another manifestation of his insecurity. My husband assumed it was his way of making a cutting joke.

After that party, the boyfriend asked my husband to friend him on Facebook, but he did not ask me. This did not insult me, but given the fact that he knows each of us equally well, the message was clear. He was snubbing me intentionally because he was still smarting from the initial exchange. Occasionally, my husband has read a comment here and there by the boyfriend because they are of interest for the way in which they reflect his issues. One of the recurring themes he has demonstrated is his condescension and his talk of being a "gentleman" or exercising "courtesy" toward people. He always speaks of it in a manner which asserts that a "gentleman" does such things for those who are less than him in some fashion or another.

Clearly, this man is far from a "gentleman" and lacks any real sense of what courtesy is. Such things are not mere hollow demonstrations, but they bring along with them a genuine intent to make people comfortable and declarations of the inferiority of the people you are exercising said courtesy toward vitiates the authenticity of the supposedly kind actions. Yet, this man not infrequently frames himself as a gentleman. He keeps saying it and I wonder if he believes that announcing who he believes he is somehow means that we should accept him as what he identifies as instead of what he demonstrates himself to be. He behaves like a rude, smug, and supercilious jerk while proclaiming himself kind and courteous.

One thing that I have noticed in America is that people have a sense of who they are. They "identify" as something or other and they feel it necessary to proclaim that identity repeatedly to the world.  There is a sense that the world doesn't get to decide for itself based on who you show yourself to be through your words and actions, but you get to choose a label and force it upon people. If they refuse to accept your self-determined identity, even when it is opposition to your behavior, then they are the ones who are in error.

This need to proclaim oneself as this, that, or the other is a manifestation of insecurity about ones sense of self. It is very much as if the people who make such proclamations, whether they come via Facebook status messages, tattoos, or personal dress style, are trying to convince you of something that they themselves are not the least bit secure about. Such messages scream "I'm totally insecure about who I am and how I'm seen so validate my self-image!" They, of course, don't even realize that they're broadcasting a psychological issue - a neuroses - for all with a perceptive mind to hear.

It's my opinion that Americans are especially prone to this sort of thing because there is no strong sense of identity common among us. Also, people are indoctrinated into the notion that being "an  individual" is important so there is a need to distinguish oneself as different from others in order to confirm ones individuality. The funny thing is that, the more people proclaim who they are, the more they become just like everyone else who isn't secure enough in their sense of self to just "be" who they are and let those around them reach their own conclusions. This need to force their self-image onto others unites them into an insecure tribe rather than divides them into individuals. I daresay that it is rarer to find someone who just "is" and allows people around them to decide for themselves than it is to find people who feel the need to bray, broadcast, and overtly advertise who they want you to think they are. These sorts of proclamations make such people part of the crowd, not stand-out individuals.

My husband is a very tolerant person and tends to be more sanguine about people's behavioral and psychological quirks than me. However, recently, even he got tired of the neurotic posting that this guy was broadcasting on Facebook and hid his feed. It wasn't that he was so pompous. It wasn't that he was so insecure. It was the fact that he couldn't see how he was coming across to others. This sad lack of self-awareness and awareness of how others see him was just more than my husband wanted to deal with intermittently. Frankly, I feel the same way. People don't get to weave their own reality and then hold up the tapestry in front of me and insist I accept that picture of them rather than the reality that is so clearly behind it. I get tired of people's issues being in my face and I especially am tired of being told repeatedly and obnoxiously who someone believes they are rather than being permitted to make up my own mind.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Your comments are welcome, but only if they are offered with respect and demonstrate that you have actually read what was said. I won't tolerate insults, straw man arguments, or bad attitude. Pretend you're talking to your boss to help put you in the right frame of mind. You can disagree, but be nice about it. Comments are moderated. There will be a delay in publishing them. Any comment that violates my rules won't be published.